Sunday 24 July 2016

NEJM Week of 7th July 2016 (#50)

Professor Brian Andrews NEJM Recommendations for Medical Students and Tutors
Week of 7th July 2016 (#50)
University of Notre Dame Australia (Fremantle Campus)


Occasional Editorial Comment

I was unsure as to where to include the five articles which include the perspective, two on adaptive randomization (AR) in breast cancer trials, the review on adaptive designs for clinical trials and the relevant editorial. While these articles focus on the AR design in breast cancer drug trials, the overall message is that many of the classical phase 2 clinical trials will be modified in the future, using instead AR trials in phase 2 studies.

This is a timely, about time, and refreshing update in clinical trials methodology. It is noteworthy that only three medical students out of 24 found any of these articles or the concept worthy of reading.
I would suggest reading the perspective article thoroughly as this clearly outlines the principles of this new approach, especially in testing oncology drugs.


Perspective

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

I-SPY 2 — A Glimpse of the Future of Phase 2 Drug Development?


The I-SPY 2 breast cancer trials assess activity of new agents by adaptive randomization, applying criteria for success on a surrogate end point to predict success in confirmatory trials. Innovative designs may speed progress and eliminate waste in drug development.

I have extracted various sections from the perspective article as these are articulated extremely well:

1.     Traditionally designed phase 2 trials that test treatments one at a time in heterogeneous groups of patients have created a traffic jam: there are too many new drugs, and the signal of a treatment effect can be diluted in these heterogeneous groups.
2.     Adaptive multigroup trials such as I-SPY 2 have the potential to answer several questions simultaneously and more efficiently than traditionally designed trials.
3.     The I-SPY 2 platform will be used to compare up to 12 experimental therapies with a common control in subgroups of breast cancer with 10 distinct biomarker signatures. 
4.     New drugs can enter the platform (see Figure 1 in the Neratinib study) as they emerge from phase 1 testing and exit the platform with an estimate of the chances of future success in a phase 3 trial of prespecified size. This will reduce cost significantly with a greater chance that successful drugs will reach the patient faster.
5.     The platform may be an appealing setting for cooperation among pharmaceutical companies and academic investigators.
6.     The entire process, including design and analysis, is carried out dynamically using Bayesian methods (see Tables 1 and 2).
7.     In the world of trial design, this new platform is still in its adolescence.

 There are many questions that will need to be answered which include:

1.     How robust are the adaptive randomization probabilities and the predictive probabilities of success in a phase 3 trial to misspecifications of the model? 
2.     What are effective ways to communicate to our clinical colleagues the modelling assumptions used, the potential vulnerability of the model to errors, and the best ways to explain these designs to trial participants?
3.     What visual and numerical summaries provide insight into the trial data? Simple summary statistics such as odds ratios or relative risk can be misleading. 
4.     Will the predicted chance of future success (85%) upset equipoise for trial investigators or influence the kinds of patients investigators choose to enrol or not enrol in a future trial? 


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer


Among patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor–negative locally advanced breast cancer, the addition of neratinib to standard therapy resulted in higher rates of pathological complete response, with some higher rates of toxic effects.

This is an important paper (especially Figure 1) which reviews the concept of an AR design and the concept of the platform to which test drugs can be added when they become available after successful phase 1 trials. The analysis of results is based on Bayesian probability which considers multiple variables in each response. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are also discussed.  

All patients (high risk clinical stage II or III breast cancer) receive the standard of care, namely paclitaxel followed by doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide. The patient then undergoes surgery and the results on the tumour are analysed.  Following these phase 2 studies, various protocols can be established for further phase 3 trials.

EDITORIAL

I-SPY 2 — Toward More Rapid Progress in Breast Cancer Treatment


The editorial reviews the two papers on the AR clinical drug trials in breast cancer and discusses the interpretation and pros and cons of the results.

There have been recent papers published in cardiology in which long-term studies have been carried out on a new device.  By the time the results are presented at meetings and then published, the original device is no longer being used, being supplanted by a newer device. What a waste of time and money! If a platform type study could be utilized to add newer devices (presumed to be more effective, but not proven) where both the new and the newer device could be studied in parallel, then time, money and earlier use by patients will be accomplished.  One wonders how device manufacturers would react to this type of trial design.


Must Read Articles


None


Articles Recommended for Medical Students


Perspective

Zika and the Risk of Microcephaly


An analysis of data from Brazil reveals a strong association between the risk of microcephaly in a newborn and the risk of Zika virus infection during the mother's first trimester of pregnancy. The association in the second and third trimesters was negligible.

In the preceding months the Journal has reviewed data on the pathology of ZIKV on the nervous system, the epidemiology of ZIKV infections and, most recently, has discussed a direct causal association between the virus and clinical disease by fulfilling standard causality criteria.

Today an article provides data from recent ZIKV outbreaks in French Polynesia and Bahia, Brazil.  The greatest chance of developing microcephaly or significant neurological impairment occurs in women who develop a symptomatic infection during the first trimester and who deliver at term.

The article produces more questions than answers.  However, it focuses on our lack of knowledge and data on the outcomes of asymptomatic ZIKV infections during pregnancy and on the other long-term, less severe neurological sequelae not encompassed by microcephaly or marked neurological impairment at birth. The authors indicate that based on the current data available more cases of significant birth defects will occur and that ZIKV infection during pregnancy should be avoided.

I believe there is also a significant ethical issue raised (the individual versus the society as a whole) with playing “Russian roulette” in endemic areas for sexually active people who avoid responsible birth control and protection.  Education should be provided by the state for women and men. If not, should society then be held responsible for the long-term health care costs in caring for neurologically impaired infants if appropriate care is not taken in prevention?

The knowledge of the ZIKV is still in its infancy, especially in terms of other modes of viral transmission, the genes associated with the expression of disease and other organ systems involved long-term in infants born to infected mothers. Stay tuned and let’s see what the Olympics produces apart from gold medals.


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Ticagrelor versus Aspirin in Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack


In this double-blind, randomized trial involving 13,199 patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, ticagrelor was not superior to aspirin in reducing the rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death at 90 days.

As predicted, a majority of MED300 and MED400 students reviewed this article but frequently did not carefully review the exclusion criteria. The authors note the lower frequency of primary outcome events (stroke, myocardial infarction or death within 90 days - usually stroke within the first two weeks) in this study with aspirin (7.5%) or ticagrelor (6.7%) compared with historical data using aspirin for secondary stroke prevention. Previous studies found a recurrent stroke rate significantly higher at between 10-15%. In previous aspirin studies, patients with surgically amenable carotid artery disease or major intracerebral vessel disease amenable to radiological intervention were not excluded in the analyses although they were in this study.

The data is from an international, randomized, double blind controlled trial comparing either aspirin or ticagrelor in 13,199 patients with a high-risk TIA or non-severe ischaemic stroke (check exclusion criteria) who were started on the drug within 24 hours of initial symptoms. Patients were followed for 90 days with the primary end-point of stroke, MI, or death. The data showed no significant difference in primary outcome with either drug i.e. ticagrelor was not superior to aspirin. The hazard ratios for each treatment should be reviewed to see subtle subgroup differences.

   
CLINICAL PRACTICE

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome


The polycystic ovary syndrome increases the risk of infertility, endometrial cancer, abnormal glucose metabolism, and dyslipidemia. Strategies such as lifestyle modification, hair removal, and combined oral contraceptive therapy and other pharmacotherapies are reviewed.

This is an excellent review on the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) with key points well summarized in the enclosed box. It should be read by all MED300 before their O&G rotation and the hyperlink stored for the future.
Figure 1 is excellent for demonstrating the basic pathophysiology of the hyperandrogenemia seen in PCOS.
 Specifically review the presented case and the section at the end on conclusions and specific recommendations for this patient. In the section of Diagnosis, there is a detailed discussion of the differential diagnosis and other conditions which need to be excluded before a definitive diagnosis of PCOS can be made.

For those who had forgotten most of what they once knew, this is a valuable review of the basic science, ovarian cholesterol metabolism, mechanisms of hyperandrogenism, and, in particular, a balanced approach to the management of PCOS and the expected outcomes with the therapies available.

Recommended learning:
1.     Review pituitary, ovarian, and adrenal axis in terms of uterine function and the menstrual cycle.
2.     Review the PCOS and other causes of increased androgen levels.


IMAGES IN CLINICAL MEDICINE

Eyelid Melanoma


An 87-year-old man presented with a stye on his left upper eyelid. Despite conservative interventions, the stye had persisted and the skin had become noticeably darker over several weeks. His risk factors included a history of prolonged sun exposure while working as a lifeguard.

This is an interesting clinical picture of an eyelid melanoma in an 87 year old male. Considering the possible complexities of the therapy the patient may have been offered, there is no wonder he decided not to return for follow up.

Recommended learning: Review the clinical presentations of melanoma, prognostic factors, pathology, principles of surgical management and advances in adjuvant and newer therapies.


IMAGES IN CLINICAL MEDICINE

Dubin–Johnson Syndrome


A 48-year-old woman scheduled to receive a laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent a preoperative evaluation. A laparoscopic exploration, shown in a video, revealed a smooth liver with normal consistency and morphology but with a grossly black appearance.

This is a very interesting and well described case of Dubin-Johnson (autosomal recessive) with excellent clinical pictures, including video, and typical histopathology. The authors demonstrate loss of the MRP2 receptor on the hepatocyte which leads to blockage of the transport of conjugated bilirubin from the canalicular pole of the hepatocyte into the bile canaliculus.

The result of the laparoscopy and biopsy were predictable based on the clinical history and normal LFTs except for the elevated conjugated bilirubin. This was a well, 48 year old woman who had had intermittent jaundice for at least 20 years associated with conjugated hyperbilirubinemia (not unconjugated as seen in the much more common entity Gilberts’ disease) with no other impairment in liver function.

Recommended learning:
1.     Review the pathophysiology and causes of hyperbilirubinemia.
2.     Review Gilbert’s disease.


CLINICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING

A Bruising Loss


A 32-year-old woman presented to her physician with a 3-week history of spontaneous bruising on her arms, legs, and back. The bruising began shortly after she had had sore throat, coryza, and malaise for several days, symptoms that had resolved without intervention.

This is a very interesting discussion of the differential diagnosis of spontaneous bruising in a 32 year old female which should be read by most medical students during their clinical years. While the cause of this acquired coagulopathy is uncommon (an autoantibody against factor VIII), the principles of management are interesting. Further the authors omitted a rare cause of a factor VIII autoantibody which is primary amyloidosis involving the spleen.

It is interesting that only one of 24 students took the time to review this article. I believe this was due to the inappropriate and “trying too hard” title which turned the students off.

The first words in a paper that the reader sees is the title and thus it is imperative that it capture the interest of the reader to proceed further into the article. The process of title selection takes time and consideration with multiple options considered and shared with co-authors.

It is generally considered that important aspects of a title should include:

1.     Sufficient information about the subsequent work.
2.     A title no more than 12 words in length.
3.     Considering how much information should be in the title? Should it summarize the results of the study? For example in the study on aspirin and ticagrelor for secondary prevention in ischaemic stroke, should the title have been “Ticagrelor and Aspirin are equally effective in preventing a second stoke in patients presenting with an ischaemic stroke?” Apart from exceeding the 12 word limit, does the title provide too much information with the reader then not inclined to read further?
4.     Try breaking the title into two components with the second following the first, but separated by a colon. For example, I wrote a review article many years ago: “Scleroderma: Advances from Osler to the Present.”
5.     Refraining from hyperbole and “attempts to be too cute.” Don’t try too hard like “A Bruising Loss.”


Important Articles Related to Mechanisms of Disease and Translational Research

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF BASIC RESEARCH

Corralling Colonic Flagellated Microbiota


A study of a mouse deficient in the gene Lypd8 showed that the Lypd8 protein prevents flagellated bacteria from invading the inner mucosal lining of colonic epithelium.

This article discusses a role of the mechanical mucous layer in the colon in protecting the host from potentially invasive gut microbiota. There is an excellent Figure 1 which demonstrates the protective role of a protein Lypd8, which is secreted by colonic epithelial cells. This protein binds to the flagellae of motile bacteria at the junction of the loose outer mucous layer with the firm inner mucous layer stopping bacteria entering the inner mucous layer. A  Lypd8 knock-out mouse model resulted in a mouse phenotype which was readily subjected to colitis and patients with inflammatory bowel disease also exhibited reduction in Lypd8 production.

Recommended learning: Review the role of host protective mechanisms within the GI tract, including mechanical barriers, and the role of the innate and adaptive immune systems.

Other Articles which should interest medical students

SPECIAL ARTICLE

State Legal Restrictions and Prescription-Opioid Use among Disabled Adults


In this analysis of Medicare data and a data set of state laws, adoption of legislation to restrict the prescribing and dispensing of opioid medications was not associated with reductions in potentially hazardous use of opioids among disabled Medicare beneficiaries.

This is a timely article on the effect(s) of laws introduced in the US to limit the epidemic of prescription narcotic abuse and to reduce opioid overdose.

In this study, the laws introduced were state specific and varied significantly between states participating from 2006 through 2012. The population studied were disabled Medicare beneficiaries aged from 21 to 64 years. Eight laws that were reviewed in this study and are illustrated best in Figure 1, together with the percentage of beneficiaries subjected to the laws.

 The results to date are disappointing from the legislative point of view. The researchers showed no significant changes in opioid outcomes, such as a decline in the number of prescriptions prescribed for morphine equivalent daily dose of 120 mg, or drug overdosage.

The authors discuss the limitations of the study, and from their findings it becomes apparent that any future similar study should take into consideration the following:

1.     A large number of participants must be included and followed for prolonged periods, possibly up to 10 years (this study was for seven years).
2.     A robust statistical analysis must be carried out.
3.     A nationwide study is more meaningful than individual state studies.
4.     The law(s) must remain stable over the duration of the study without any law changes.
5.     Limiting the amount of opioid in each prescription only appears to lead to more frequent visits to the GP or pain specialist, which significantly increases the total cost to the health care system, and adds more work to overworked GPs in particular without changing the net prescribing habits.
6.     Any laws introduced should be based on evidence and should not be “feel good” or “something needs to be done” laws.

This is an extremely challenging area where changes are probably not likely to be seen in the short-term future.

The only hope I see for future change is early education of medical students and doctors in training. Training should include the ability to make the appropriate diagnosis. This skill should include an understanding of the natural course of the pain syndrome, and learning appropriate scientific, pharmacological, and clinical pain management for both acute and particularly early chronic pain syndromes before inappropriate prescribing habits become established. The future lies in medical student education in alleviating this problem.